The Variance Matters: How Party Systems Represent the Preferences of Voters
نویسنده
چکیده
Cross-national analyses are presented that suggest that changes in the variance of voters’ policy preferences—in 12 Western European democracies from 1976 to 1998—are associated with corresponding changes in the variance of policy choices on offer in these party systems. This finding is labeled the Voter Distribution Effects Result. There is also evidence to support a second major finding, the Electoral Laws Result, which states that voter distribution effects, i.e., the effects associated with changes in the variance of voters’ policy preferences, are stronger in political systems that feature less proportional electoral rules (e.g., plurality voting systems). These findings have implications for party strategies and for our general understanding of political representation.
منابع مشابه
On the nature of voters’ coalition preferences
An expanding literature indicates that in multiparty systems with coalition governments, citizens consider the post-electoral bargaining process among parties when casting their vote. Yet, we know surprisingly little about the nature of voters' coalition preferences. This paper uses data from the Austrian National Election Study to examine the determinants as well as the independence of prefere...
متن کاملGovernator vs. Hunter and Aggregator: A simulation of party competition with vote-seeking and office-seeking rules
The policy positions parties choose are central to both attracting voters and forming coalition governments. How then should parties choose positions to best represent voters? Laver and Sergenti show that in an agent-based model with boundedly rational actors a decision rule (Aggregator) that takes the mean policy position of its supporters is the best rule to achieve high congruence between vo...
متن کاملHow Hard is Bribery in Party Based Elections?
In a party-based election voters are grouped into parties and the voters belonging to the same party are assumed to cast their votes according to the fixed party preference over the set of candidates. For such elections, we investigate the complexity of the following problem: can we make some distinguished candidate win (or lose) the election by bribing at most k voters to switch from their ori...
متن کاملAn Informational Rationale for Political Parties1
This paper studies a model of political parties as informative “brands” to voters. Voters across a large number of constituencies are assumed to be risk averse and incompletely informed about candidate ideal policies, and candidates are unable to commit to a declared policy platform. In this environment, parties can play a critical role by aggregating ideologically similar candidates and signal...
متن کاملHow Credible is the Prediction of a Party-Based Election?
In a party-based election, the voters are grouped into parties and all voters of a party are assumed to vote according to the party preferences over the candidates. Hence, once the party preferences are declared the outcome of the election can be predicted. However, in the actual election, the members of some “instable" parties often leave their own parties to join other parties. We introduce t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007